A new year has introduced a feasible new stance towards China by the U.S.
The White House told NewsNation the Biden management would continue to get tougher through a series of brand-new plans in 2023 focused on restricting China’s influence, economic development, and military toughness.
” We are encountering a rival that is figured out to overtake U.S. technical management and happy to dedicate nearly endless sources to that goal,” Jake Sullivan, national safety and security adviser, said.
Sullivan called it the “Protect Program.”
The strategy no longer watches Chinese growth as beneficial to the U.S. as a partner but instead as a hazard from a geopolitical competitor.
The shift on China improves what the Trump management started, and also we’re currently seeing the Biden administration execute it. In the last few months, the White House has actually enforced restrictions on American business’ foreign financial investments in China and on their production of particular points there, such as microchips, saying it will, “protect against business that receive taxpayer cash from turning around and also making financial investments in China that threaten our national protection.”
However the “Protect Program” might wind up injuring American customers. Continued tolls as well as stretched relations with China can lead to Americans paying more for everyday items. That’s a rate the White House and also most of Congress appears willing to pay.
” There is a bipartisan concern over the long-term united state Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis.
In the new year, Gallagher will chair the brand new select committee on China, made with greatly the same goal as the White House’s “Secure Agenda.”
Gallagher informed NewsNation previously this year that his greatest fear is China’s expanding army as well as the hazard of a Taiwan invasion.”We are merely not acting with the requisite feeling of urgency this risk demands,” Gallagher stated.
The Bureau of Labor Data stated rates for whatever was imported from China increased 1.8% from last year.
In 2023, President Joe Biden is taking a tougher stance on China, citing concerns over human rights violations, intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. The move marks a significant shift in the United States’ relationship with China, which has long been characterized by economic cooperation and cultural exchange.
Under the Biden administration, the United States has imposed a series of tariffs and sanctions on Chinese goods and companies, citing the need to level the playing field for American workers and businesses. The president has also made it a priority to address China’s controversial policies in Xinjiang and Hong Kong, calling for an end to the repression of Uighur Muslims and the erosion of democratic freedoms in the semi-autonomous region.
The new approach to China has been met with both praise and criticism. Supporters argue that the United States must stand up for its values and protect its interests, while detractors worry about the potential for a damaging trade war and a deterioration of relations between the two countries.
Here are some key takeaways from the Biden administration’s tougher stance on China:
Trade tensions on the rise
The United States and China have long had a complicated relationship when it comes to trade, with both sides accusing the other of unfair practices. The situation has only escalated under the Biden administration, with the United States imposing tariffs on Chinese goods and targeting specific companies with sanctions.
One major point of contention is China’s failure to protect intellectual property rights. The United States has accused China of stealing technology and trade secrets from American companies, leading to the loss of jobs and competitiveness. In response, the Biden administration has implemented measures to safeguard intellectual property and prevent the theft of American technology.
Another issue is China’s state-subsidized industries, which the United States argues give Chinese companies an unfair advantage in the global market. The Biden administration has called for the end of such subsidies and is pushing for reforms that would level the playing field for American businesses.
Human rights concerns at the forefront
The Biden administration has also condemned China’s treatment of Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang, where the Chinese government is accused of committing widespread human rights abuses, including forced labor, mass detention, and cultural assimilation. The United States has imposed sanctions on Chinese officials and companies involved in these practices, and President Biden has called on China to end the repression of Uighurs and other minority groups.
In addition, the Biden administration has expressed concern over the erosion of democratic freedoms in Hong Kong, which was promised a high degree of autonomy under the “one country, two systems” framework agreed upon when the British returned control of the territory to China in 1997. The Chinese government’s decision to impose a national security law in Hong Kong, which has been met with widespread protests, has been met with condemnation from the United States and other Western countries.
Cooperation in some areas, despite tensions
Despite the tensions between the United States and China, the two countries have continued to cooperate in certain areas, including climate change and pandemic response. President Biden has emphasized the need for global cooperation on these issues, and China has been a key player in international efforts to combat climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic.
It remains to be seen how the relationship between the United States and China will evolve in the coming years. While the Biden administration’s tougher stance on China has been met with some resistance, it has also been met with support from those who believe that the United States must stand up for its values and interests. Ultimately, the success of the new approach will depend on the ability of both countries to find a balance between competition and cooperation and to address their differences in a constructive manner.